Cognitive Functions Myths in MBTI | MBTI Type Guide
About Cognitive Functions, Most MBTI Enthusiasts Get This Wrong
Many MBTI enthusiasts describe unsettling experiences of 'cognitive function loops' and 'grips.' Discover what science reveals about these psychological phenomena and how they can lead to personal growth.
ByElena DuboisFebruary 20, 20263 min read
INTPINFPESTJ
About Cognitive Functions, Most MBTI Enthusiasts Get This Wrong
Quick Answer
This article clarifies that common MBTI concepts like 'cognitive function loops' and 'grip states' are often misunderstood as simple overthinking or stress. Instead, they represent deeper psychological phenomena tied to the failure to engage auxiliary functions or the exposure of type-specific vulnerabilities. Recognizing these intricate experiences, supported by researchers like Dario Nardi and Susan Storm, fosters greater self-awareness and personal growth by encouraging engagement with one's
Key Takeaways
Cognitive function loops are not mere overthinking but signify a failure to engage one's auxiliary function, leading to stagnation; breaking free involves actively seeking external feedback.
Grip states are profound emotional takeovers, not just stress, revealing unique vulnerabilities specific to each MBTI type, as shown by Susan Storm's research with over 120,000 individuals.
The manifestation of loops and grips varies significantly across MBTI types, influenced by their cognitive stack, meaning an ESTJ's experience differs greatly from an INFP's.
Understanding these deeper psychological phenomena encourages self-awareness and personal growth by prompting individuals to engage with all their cognitive functions rather than simplifying personality interpretations.
If personality types are stable, why does the same person test differently in their 20s and 40s? The answer lies not in test reliability, but in something Carl Jung called 'individuation.'
Myth #1: Cognitive Function Loops Are Just Overthinking
Many people mistake cognitive function loops—those frustrating moments when we get stuck in our heads for too long—as mere overthinking. This is understandable; we've all been there, caught in a mental whirlpool. But that's not the whole story.
Cognitive loops aren't just about spiraling thoughts; they signal a failure to engage our auxiliary function, which can lead to stagnation. Take my student Marcus, an INTP. He became so fixated on perfecting a project that he completely ignored the collaborative insights his Fe auxiliary could provide, paralyzing his progress. It wasn’t just overthinking; it was a disconnect from the very tools that could help him.
The Real Danger of the Loop
Research suggests cognitive function loops are more intricate than simple overthinking. Dario Nardi's work, particularly in his book 'Neuroscience of Personality' (2011), indicates that cognitive functions play a crucial role in our interactions with our environments. When we neglect these functions, we risk spiraling into loops that hinder our growth.
Cognitive function loops indicate a deeper cognitive struggle, not just overthinking.
What to Do About It
If you find yourself in a loop, try setting a 5-minute timer and reach out to someone for feedback. Engaging your auxiliary function can provide the perspective you need to break free.
Myth #2: Grip States Are Just Temporary Stress
A grip state feels like your personality has been hijacked. It's not just stress; it's a full-blown emotional takeover. This is a common misconception, likely because stress is something we all experience. But that assumption is wrong.
Grip states can lead to profound distress, leaving individuals feeling utterly lost. Susan Storm's research with over 120,000 individuals indicates that these states can unearth vulnerabilities specific to each personality type, transforming a momentary reaction into a significant emotional event.
More Than a Bad Mood
The evidence is compelling. Storm’s findings underscore that grip states expose vulnerabilities unique to each MBTI type, showing that these experiences can have lasting psychological ramifications.
Grip states reveal deeper vulnerabilities tied to personality types.
What to Do About It
When in a grip state, pause and reflect on the emotions that surface. Consider journaling about these feelings or speaking to a trusted friend who can help you process them. Recognizing and addressing these vulnerabilities can be a powerful step toward regaining control.
Myth #3: Anyone Can Experience Loops or Grips Equally
Do we all fall apart the same way? An ESTJ's meltdown looks nothing like an INFP's. There's a prevailing belief that loops and grips affect everyone in the same way. This perspective likely emerges from our shared struggles with psychological states. But the reality is, it’s not so straightforward.
Different MBTI types experience loops and grips in unique ways, depending on their cognitive stack. For instance, an ESTJ might express a grip state as authoritarianism, while an INFP could retreat into a deep emotional abyss. The cognitive functions at play shape how these experiences manifest.
The Unique Experience of Each Type
Dario Nardi's research highlights the nuanced ways cognitive functions influence behavior. This means loops and grips aren’t just personal quirks; they are intricately linked to the psychological frameworks of personality types.
Loops and grips manifest uniquely across different personality types.
What to Do About It
To better understand your unique experience during loops and grips, consider taking a moment to journal about how these states manifest for you. What patterns do you notice? Engaging with your type's cognitive functions may help you develop strategies tailored to your experiences.
Cognitive Functions For Beginners || MBTI 101
The Bigger Picture
Understanding cognitive function loops and grips forces us to rethink our approach to personality psychology. It encourages a move beyond simplistic interpretations of personality types.
For the MBTI community, this recognition emphasizes the complexity of our experiences and the importance of engaging with all cognitive functions. It invites deeper self-awareness and promotes growth rather than stagnation.
Senior Editor at MBTI Type Guide. Elena writes the pieces that dig into where MBTI comes from — Jungian cognitive function theory, the historical context, the things modern type descriptions tend to flatten. Thoughtful, careful, and comfortable holding contradictions.
Get Personality Insights
Weekly articles on career, relationships, and growth — tailored to your personality type.
I totally get that different MBTI types experience loops and grips uniquely, like the ESTJ vs. INFP example. But sometimes I feel like the *intensity* of the 'hijacked' feeling is more universal, even if how it looks on the outside is different. Like, my own ISFP grip state is about withdrawing, but it feels just as overwhelming as what an ESTJ might describe. The journaling advice at the end for understanding *my* patterns is still super helpful though.
A
Alex ChenINTP
Feb 15
OMG, the Marcus example hit home so hard for me. As an INTP, I get that 'fixated on perfecting a project' paralysis completely. My Ti-Si loop gets so intense I totally forget to reach out and use my Fe, just like you described. Setting that 5-minute timer to talk to someone for feedback is actually genius; I'm gonna try that next time I'm stuck.
M
Maria RodriguezESFJ
Feb 14
Yes! Myth #2 about grip states being more than just temporary stress is spot on. When I'm in a grip, it's not just a bad mood; it feels like my whole personality is completely overwhelmed, almost hijacked, like the article says. Susan Storm's research on specific vulnerabilities for each type really explains why it feels so uniquely awful for me as an ESFJ.